Posts: 133
Threads: 7
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: May 2011
Mood: None
Part of the beauty and appeal of a forum like this is the bank of field reports it has on file. I understand lowly punters can be loath to file these for fear of upsetting service providers who are members or providers who may just lurk.
I propose that punters should be able to submit their field reports to a mod who can filter/redact any incendiary comments and post them under their mod account.
Any comeback from providers could be directed to the mod and mediated in private.
Sound OK?
•
Posts: 5,456
Threads: 317
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Mood: None
u have that exactly right pan, that has been a few members concerns that they didnt want to upset the provider by posting a field report on them
•
Posts: 2,291
Threads: 46
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: May 2011
Mood: None
A lot of work for a mod if we get lots more joining. That sort of language diminishes the impact of a review anyway.There needs to be a degree of respect from posters that they will state facts only, and not use incendiary language - otherwise the review will be deleted. They can then submit a new one without the inflammatory language.
So you couldn't say: It was a bait and switch. Beautiful girl in the pictures, complete f*ing dog at the door. What a waste of f*ing time and effort.
But they could say: It was a bait and switch. Beautiful pictures, but the girl I met was not to my taste at all. I left immediately and am upset that I have had my time and effort wasted.
What about a forum topic of Reviews Chat. They have that on E-I. Reviews could be put up and then if someone wants to make a comment on the review, they can start a discussion there.
•
Posts: 133
Threads: 7
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: May 2011
Mood: None
29-06-2011, 12:02
(This post was last modified: 29-06-2011, 12:05 by Pan.)
I agree that it would be a lot of work the current mods, Shy. Perhaps you could employ a dedicated mod?
A review section in a punters only section may work. I know this isn't just punting, but bad cam reports could also be discussed there without fear.
•
Posts: 5,456
Threads: 317
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Mood: None
blogs seem to be getting used more for detailing the meetings
•
Posts: 4,050
Threads: 117
Thanks Received: 1 in 1 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2011
Mood: None
Could people not provide a link to the place in which they have chosen to write their FR when it has been writtenb by them, so they can be viewed from here for discussion? It would save duplicating writing reports if they met on a different site. That would also mean less work for us mods, as only reports about meets generated directly from here would be submitted from scratch.
•
Posts: 2,291
Threads: 46
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: May 2011
Mood: None
01-07-2011, 20:29
(This post was last modified: 01-07-2011, 20:30 by SassyAnn.)
But what if you don't have access (or have been banned) from the site on which the review is held?
Could it be a cut & paste job with an accreditation to where it first appeared?
•
Posts: 4,050
Threads: 117
Thanks Received: 1 in 1 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2011
Mood: None
(01-07-2011, 20:29)ShySmile Wrote: But what if you don't have access (or have been banned) from the site on which the review is held?
Could it be a cut & paste job with an accreditation to where it first appeared?
As long as the poster is the originator of the Field Report I don't see why not.
•
Posts: 133
Threads: 7
Thanks Received: 0 in 0 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: May 2011
Mood: None
I'll get the ball rolling and get one written. Visit from yesterday well worth recalling.
•
Posts: 4,050
Threads: 117
Thanks Received: 1 in 1 posts
Thanks Given: 0
Joined: Apr 2011
Mood: None
•