hiding ratings

[abcdef]

is it just me but i think this facility should be taken away

[kenny m]

Its used by escorts who get bad feedback and cant accept it, anyway when you see someone with about 20 positives, and no negative feedback, you wonder how many of their frends have said something just to make them look good,

[abcdef]

still should be taken away, it wasnt something i had noticed till a client had told me to check a few profiles where they were supposed to be women but the feed back from bookings from webcams or phone who in turn was a guy, then the fb got hidden as if the lady had received them from escorting

[ScarlettDawn]

is it just me but i think this facility should be taken away

So if someone gets a bad rating they can just "hide" it or delete it?

That seems to compromise the whole rating system.

[abcdef]

I don't know if it can be deleted but whatever is said about the person can be hidden

[kenny m]

I always thought the escort or provider, had to agree to the review being shown before it was listed, so used to take what was "said with a pinch of salt" (where did that quote come from).

When I read the reviews though, I allow for one not favourable for every 15 that are good, though I have to say that is fior escortuing, as you dont usually get bad reviews for web link ior phone chat.

[Emily of Halifax]

The way I understand it if you get an actual field report you have to click to click the option to display it yourself.

Ratings are different you have to either show all or show none you cannot selectively choose which ones to display

If I am wrong in thinking this can someone please let me know

[abcdef]

your totally right emily

[Tom30]

The adultwork rating window is flawed in 2 ways:
1) The ability to block reviews/ratings/reports.
2) If you gain just 1 negative rating it flags your name as red to the escort as a means of showing her he is bad news, so when a client sends an email some escorts will see the red name especially if he has 2+ aliases, and delete it straight away without even checking out his feedback.

On my previous username i had about 10-15 good escort ratings with like 5-10 good webcam ratings, and 1 negative escort rating which was a simple mix up mistake on her part which she clearly said so in my following good rating, yet my new username is still flagged as red...

So it would be useful if we could change our rating for someone whenever we wanted to.

[English Kate]

perhaps they should adopt a traffic light system, where if you get a negative it shows up red, but then if you get say 5 positives it turns to orange and a further 5 makes it back to green, with the history of the negative still there if you really want to see it? Obviously if you get any more reds, it will go back to red or stay there until at least 5 positives are achieved. It could be a fair way to deal with it?

Personally if someone does not allow me to see their feedback I air on the side of caution. I would rather see one negative and other feedback and make my own mind up than nothing and have no idea at all what the problem was. I won't meet them.

Also, some people seem to get this wrong. When you get a booking on AW you tick the box to schedule it, but you must not confirm it until after the booking has taken place. If you do confirm it and it turns out he is a timewaster he can still leave feedback, which could turn out to be negative out of spite (there are some weirdos out there).

This is meant to protect the Escort from being left bad reviews by bogus clients, however they can still leave feedback, but it does not show up at the top as an additional number in brackets.

Field reports. I didn't have a clue about these when I first started and had a couple written on me that were hidden for ages, as I didn't know to action them. You will never see a negative feedback on AW, as the Escort has the choice to post them or not. I think we do need to have some say with them, as sometimes due to the amount that needs to be written, personal information can be divulged or they can be a little too intimate, but it would probably hold a little more kudos if they negatives ones had to be displayed as well, which would eliminate the need for pnet etc.

With reference to 20 good reviews and no negative ones. I can't imagine trying to find 20 people to leave me that many fake reviews, isn't that a bit excessive? 3 or 4, agreed.