No Reply.

[F3rm4t]

I think that if the girl has read several messages, then she should at least have replied to one.... even if it is just to say "Sorry, can't make that".

Does she deserve negative feedback for it?

I sent first e-mail on wednesday for a friday booking, second was sent on thursday, then another on friday morning, then asking why no answer on the sunday.

So as you suggested that if I still wanted to see her i should send her a booking form, for which I did for the monday afternoon and gave a phone number, it was not till I left a negative response on feedack that she replied, saying that she had seen my e-mails.

I think Trinity said she 'should' have replied. I would agree, she should have replied. The question is whether it is wasting your time to not reply.

If she had accepted you booking and cancelled an hour beforehand, then fair enough, negative feedback. If she had replied and told you she would arrange something with you the following week and didn't, then fair enough, negative feedback.

If a customer of mine sends me an enquiry and for whatever reason I don't respond within what they consider to be a reasonable time frame they take their business elsewhere.

If you rang a restaurant to book a table and they didn't answer you would book somewhere else wouldn't you? You wouldn't ring them for four nights on the trot, then march down there and ask them way they chose not to answer the phone and then camp outside with a sign warning other customers that they don't answer the phone would you?

By the way, if the answer to the last question was yes, then I give up.

I would suggest that if you emailed her on Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and then on Sunday asking why she hadn't replied to the first three she would begin to be glad (rightly or wrongly - I don't know you) that she hadn't answered the first one.

In answer to you previous post where you said...

"So I should not say anything wrong about the fact she is very selective whom she responds too"

I think it is entirely her business if she wants to be selective in her responses. I see that as her prerogative; annoying maybe, wasting your time not so much, deserving of negative feedback not really.

[spklors]

I think that if the girl has read several messages, then she should at least have replied to one.... even if it is just to say "Sorry, can't make that".

Does she deserve negative feedback for it?

I sent first e-mail on wednesday for a friday booking, second was sent on thursday, then another on friday morning, then asking why no answer on the sunday.

So as you suggested that if I still wanted to see her i should send her a booking form, for which I did for the monday afternoon and gave a phone number, it was not till I left a negative response on feedack that she replied, saying that she had seen my e-mails.

I think Trinity said she 'should' have replied. I would agree, she should have replied. The question is whether it is wasting your time to not reply.

If she had accepted you booking and cancelled an hour beforehand, then fair enough, negative feedback. If she had replied and told you she would arrange something with you the following week and didn't, then fair enough, negative feedback.

If a customer of mine sends me an enquiry and for whatever reason I don't respond within what they consider to be a reasonable time frame they take their business elsewhere.

If you rang a restaurant to book a table and they didn't answer you would book somewhere else wouldn't you? You wouldn't ring them for four nights on the trot, then march down there and ask them way they chose not to answer the phone and then camp outside with a sign warning other customers that they don't answer the phone would you?

By the way, if the answer to the last question was yes, then I give up.

I would suggest that if you emailed her on Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and then on Sunday asking why she hadn't replied to the first three she would begin to be glad (rightly or wrongly - I don't know you) that she hadn't answered the first one.

In answer to you previous post where you said...

"So I should not say anything wrong about the fact she is very selective whom she responds too"

I think it is entirely her business if she wants to be selective in her responses. I see that as her prerogative; annoying maybe, wasting your time not so much, deserving of negative feedback not really.

Thanks for the reply.

I agree that she can be selective in her responses, just as I have the same right to respond in a way that is my perogative.

I had used the system she requested, and was polite each time, all it required was a simple no and I would have accepted that.

The fact she didnt bother replying proved to me despite making a booking request, that she was hardly considering her potential customers.

[F3rm4t]

I had used the system she requested, and was polite each time, all it required was a simple no and I would have accepted that.

OK I agree with what you are saying. I don't think she should have ignored you. However I don't think her choosing not to reply warrants negative feedback.

At this juncture I am just going to agree to disagree and retreat from this particular debate.

[sarahxxx]

I think as usua the whole debate is subjective and we can only go on what has been said

There is:-

1. The way spklors saw it, which we have heard
2. The females version of events, which has not been told
3. What realy happened....

It would seem that spklors was desperate to see this girl and rather than just moving on to another, blames her for his desperation and ultimate frustration. As already said he could simply have booked with another girl and chosen not to wasted further time he values so highly. unfortuanrtely it was not to be this time and now as others have said, may not happen in the future should he wish too following his neg feedback.

We do not know who the female is so can not see if she has a good reputaion / feedback and this has not been provided. there may of been good reason for her to simply ignore the email request as we are not privvy to the contents of what she read. Personally I rarely bother to repy to emails as most are meaningless and ask questions relating to what is on my profile.

I do however understand his frustration of not getting a response, but if the lady in question has read your message and not replied then take the hint, move on. If you do not it is then you that is wasting your time not her.

Sarah x x x

[spklors]

There is:-

1. The way spklors saw it, which we have heard
2. The females version of events, which has not been told
3. What realy happened....

It would seem that spklors was desperate to see this girl and rather than just moving on to another, blames her for his desperation and ultimate frustration.

Sarah x x x

Okay, so if what I have said is not the truth, then why would I speak out about it, what is it about the sent e-mails that you dont believe.

The reason I didn't move on to another, is because I am raised with principals, and if i ask to see a lady, then I will not send another e-mail asking to see someone else just because the first has not had time to reply.

Its called manners.

[Trinity-Belle]

...if the lady in question has read your message and not replied then take the hint, move on...

Yea, I guess.

I'm guessing that he didn't actually leave "negative" feedback, because the girl wouldn't have scheduled and confirmed the booking in the system... so it would only have been a "feedback only" comment. If she has good feedback already, then one comment like this is not going to ruin her.

Frankly, he has only said what happened... and she has responded. People can see it and make of it what they will.

I know I should be on the escorts "side", but to be honest I do think it is rude not to reply. Maybe other girls get more messages on AW than me, but I'm a busy girl yet I'm not overwhelmed with messages. I probably spend no more than ten minutes a day on messages on average. Yea it's a drag if guys ask stuff which is already on your profile, but personally I don't get that terribly often. And even if I do, I still reply - even if only to say "you need to read my profile"! If they are total dicks and I don't want to see them then I block them.

Maybe other girls get more messages than me, and more time wasters. I dunno.

[sarahxxx]

Okay, so if what I have said is not the truth, then why would I speak out about it, what is it about the sent e-mails that you dont believe.

I never said that what you are saying is not the truth and I have no idea what you put in your email.

Sarah x x x

[Lolly]

Today, six days after my opening pm to the escort, she complained about me giving her negative feedback, saying that she has a family member in hospital, and that it is unjust of me to give her the bad feedback, as I said she was a waste of time.

Was I wrong in doing so, I sent polite e-mails as she didnt give a phone number, and I didnt want to book another for fear that she might come back later and say the booking time was okay, so I missed out on seeing an escort.

Do you think I was wrong to give negative feedback!.

I am not an escort, but i cam, i get lots of emails a day, i reply to them all unless its someone that has been in freeview ask a question and already got his answer or is harrassing me.
Yes she should of replyed depending on when she saw your message as it tells you when she read your messages.
But
we are all human and if she is going threw a tough time give her a break.

Negative feedback was not fair at all just because she did not respond to your email booking.

If she had excepted it and cocked you around fine or if you had meet her and she was rude and didnt give you a good experiance them a neg would be warrented but this clearly was not the case.

Sometimes the feedback system sucks

[F3rm4t]

I'm guessing that he didn't actually leave "negative" feedback, because the girl wouldn't have scheduled and confirmed the booking in the system... so it would only have been a "feedback only" comment.

Trinity made a good point that I had overlooked and I think others may have done so too. What was left was probably a feedback comment that was negative in content, not a negative feedback.

I guess that makes it less of an issue, although I would still suggest it was unnecessary.

[spklors]

I have seen many a lady and have given correct and honest feedback to the ones that deserve it, and hope that in doing so they get intrested people to make up their minds about making a booking.

If it is going to work at all, it has to be seen to be fair, and when someone does not warrant positive feedback I dont give it, when someone shows no concern to someone who wants to make a booking, then its only fair that they are seen in a negative way.

That said its all water under the bridge now, and time to float on.